tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post2511246605756610242..comments2023-02-25T00:30:59.543-08:00Comments on the Evolution hoax: A Real TruthARedeemedVoicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-91339038183549753232013-06-18T12:24:42.801-07:002013-06-18T12:24:42.801-07:00my freind, the missing links are still missing aft...my freind, the missing links are still missing after a 150 year promise from Darwin to find them. They will never be found because evolution is a lie. They should be there in abundance. They are not there. That fact alone should stop all this mumbo jumbo. Trying to make the lie the truth is rooted in Money. That simple. So that is all that needs to be said. let's move forward with the truth. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-65159202517538736122013-02-23T07:30:32.379-08:002013-02-23T07:30:32.379-08:00Charles Darwin proved his theories of evolution wi...Charles Darwin proved his theories of evolution with compelling evidence when he completed his 1859 book on 'the origin of species' take a look in the book and it explains EXACTLY what Darwin did to prove it to the world. in 1859 science was nothing like what we are capable of achieving today and not only are today's scientist's using new technology to prove 'existing theories of evoultion' but they are using technology to reproduce what they looked like using methods such as Carbon dating and other new techniques.<br /><br />I dont see how science and evidence from it can be argued with when the evidence clear, but at the end of the day if you have a beliefe then your never going to believe in science, no matter what any one tells you and it will carry on this way for generations to come, just as it has from 1859 until today.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-60677506092810074512013-01-24T03:13:52.346-08:002013-01-24T03:13:52.346-08:00We're not talking about simple adaptability. W...We're not talking about simple adaptability. We're talking about the genetic structure of their body changing. Their body is now both producing more red blood cells than is 'normal'. Though these blood cells have also increased their molecular capacity for carrying oxygen. This is nothing like increased muscle mass. This is more like a human growing a third arm to help.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08441849578432081128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-69438038000959671832012-12-26T11:42:56.817-08:002012-12-26T11:42:56.817-08:00How is a built in adaptability proof of evolution?...How is a built in adaptability proof of evolution? Are Tibetans living at high altitude now a different species? Men who lift weights have larger muscles. Is this evolution? Please teach me.<br />daverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10921322627988526386noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-88139988448515096912012-10-12T02:22:57.529-07:002012-10-12T02:22:57.529-07:00Hi Jack, sorry i did'nt publish your commet ab...Hi Jack, sorry i did'nt publish your commet above, I was going to do it when I had the time to respond to your specific points. So there you go, published and in broad daylight :-)ARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-12255684171456875792012-08-14T07:24:24.464-07:002012-08-14T07:24:24.464-07:00I see, you would like me to comment on your challe...I see, you would like me to comment on your challenges because you already have your little book of returning comments on them as you have researched them. How about I swing on something that you haven't looked into previously and see if you can counter claim that eh? <br /><br />If you look at Tibetan's blood. You'll find something rather remarkable. Due to the high altitude some of them live in, they require the ability to bond more oxygen to the haemoglobin in their blood. This is why, if you or I, ascended a nice tall mountain. We'd find breathing difficult. Too little Oxygen is being processed. But, rather amazingly, over the past 300 years (by comparing bloodlines of those who stayed at lower elevation and those who branched off and lived in the higher elevation) this group of individual's blood can now claim more Oxygen per haemoglobin unit. Despite the lower Oxygen levels. So, whilst others will experience SoB, tiring and under extreme situations, unconsciousness. Those with this mutation are able to live as if on ground level. <br /><br />This is a fantastic example of modern day evolution. Now, explain that for me please. Or, as I previously stated, did God simply feel that the Tibetans were that little bit better and deserved the ability to live at high elevation?<br /><br />I can give more if you'd like?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08441849578432081128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-41339292097919420662012-08-14T04:19:19.092-07:002012-08-14T04:19:19.092-07:00Hello Jack, that is a lot of statement, but not mu...Hello Jack, that is a lot of statement, but not much depth. I could state how wrong you are in what you say, but without good backing to my argument then it is just an argument without depth. Perhaps you could comment on some of the other articles here that challenge the evolution claims.<br /><br />Thanks ARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-44685017058460738442012-08-11T08:45:08.196-07:002012-08-11T08:45:08.196-07:00Wow... Here I am, minding my business whilst walki...Wow... Here I am, minding my business whilst walking through town when some individual hands me a small card. Taking it, I continue my conversation whilst glancing at my new possession and realise the utter drivel I have just been handed.<br /><br />The Evolution Hoax...<br /><br />Really?<br /><br />Are you people generally being serious with this stuff or is this just one serious troll? You're actually going as far as to debate the facts of Evolution? Something we can see in all creatures around today. Something we've catalogued actually happening with humans over the last 100 years. Or was it god's whim that only humans living in high altitude area's blood should capture oxygen more effectively? Or is that a lie as well? <br /><br />I understand that you guys might be short sighted enough not to believe in evolution, but why go about trying to push this spout of close mindedness on other people. Everyone knows the truth of Evolution, but a very small number of people are willing to close their eyes to the facts and simply decide its wrong since an outdated book claims otherwise. <br /><br />I honestly can't believe this idea exists.<br /><br />Rant over.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08441849578432081128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-90436376413159341472012-01-23T01:06:07.309-08:002012-01-23T01:06:07.309-08:00@ Anon, thank you for admiting the falseness of it...@ Anon, thank you for admiting the falseness of it. What is funny is that I get different explanations as to why they are still in the text books. From 'i don't know why they are there' to 'they are not taught as fact' (when they clearly are in the books) to 'you know nothing about evolution, go study some books' - truth is, I am presenting the books as untrustworthy that I am told to go and study.ARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-22015106944502208252012-01-22T14:08:28.087-08:002012-01-22T14:08:28.087-08:00I really cannot tell you why it was published sinc...I really cannot tell you why it was published since it is known to be an untrue statement from the Victorian era. I can say that we were explicitly told it was not true, and it is unfortunate if those who teach don't mention it. No matter, that's a small fault in a huge line of independent evidence that no scientist has heavily relied on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-10989736167626275772012-01-22T13:09:35.529-08:002012-01-22T13:09:35.529-08:00to say they are being phased out is a bit strange,...to say they are being phased out is a bit strange, why would they do it for decades when over one hundred years later they were proven fakes?ARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-40040102938349703352012-01-22T13:08:32.736-08:002012-01-22T13:08:32.736-08:00the text books are on the shelves with this in as ...the text books are on the shelves with this in as fact, at waterstones, you can go and have a look: Mike Boyle & Kathryn Senior’s Human biology (3rd edition 2008, pg. 401)ARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-22668550902053577182012-01-22T13:08:02.858-08:002012-01-22T13:08:02.858-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.ARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-40871754192523198772012-01-22T13:06:57.037-08:002012-01-22T13:06:57.037-08:00read the scans Anon, they are used as facts in the...read the scans Anon, they are used as facts in the booksARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-83992640305516479282012-01-22T12:59:07.411-08:002012-01-22T12:59:07.411-08:00I would like to point out that Haeckels embryos ar...I would like to point out that Haeckels embryos are mentioned in textbooks as a controversy and are NOT used as evidence. When I read about it, it was to prove that new theories can be invalid and to interpret evidence critically. That is why it is in textbooks, not to mention it is being phased out. Be accepting of facts. Religion can be incorporated with an understanding of science. So as a general statement, please stop preaching out of ignorance and grab a textbook rather than an unreliable biased website. Extremes can really makes people question faith.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-32581453949760443132011-12-21T05:41:17.832-08:002011-12-21T05:41:17.832-08:00@ Fiachrá Duffy.
These people may have been sayi...@ Fiachrá Duffy. <br /><br />These people may have been saying these things, but have you read the very clear hoaxes on this website? what do you have to say about Haekels embryo fakes still in the text books? you make a lot of claims against these people, but I have not made any of those claims here. What say you about the claims made here?<br /><br />take careARedeemedVoicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822409101868095560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-588974517920222280.post-41842169941861845122011-12-07T10:38:51.910-08:002011-12-07T10:38:51.910-08:00There were people handing out your leaflets and le...There were people handing out your leaflets and lecturing about evolution being a hoax today outside the GPO in Dublin. I approached them and tried to correct the mis-truths they were spouting but I was just told to go to this website. <br /><br />They were telling people that the formation of stars and the big bang were all part of the evolution hoax. It shows how little actual scientific knowledge you people have and how you are willing to lie and to deceive people in a devious attempt to blacken the theory of evolution. You should be ashamed of yourselves as people and as Christians - to break your own commandments (given to you by your god) - thou shalt not lie; in an attempt to further your own agenda.<br /><br />Fiachrá Duffy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com